Archive for the ‘Spousal Support’ Category

Custody Modification

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

Custody Modification

My ex-husband and I divorced two years ago and he was awarded custody of our three children.  Is there anything I can do to change the custody award?

Either party may ask the court to modify any portion of the judgment that provides for the custody, parenting time, visitation, support and welfare of the minor children. ORS 107.135(1)(a).  The party seeking the modification, however, must show there has been an unanticipated substantial change of circumstances since the original, or most recent, custody award; otherwise, the party seeking modification will not be entitled to any relief.  Only after the court finds there has been an unanticipated substantial change of circumstances since the original, or most recent, custody award, will the court consider whether it is in the child’s best interests to modify custody.

In Co v. Storm, 236 Or.App. 578, 238 P.3d 30 (Or. App., 2010), the Oregon Court of Appeals established the following standard for modifying child custody:

A party seeking a change of custody must show, first, that “circumstances relevant to the capacity of either the moving party or the legal custodian to take care of the child properly have changed” since the entry of the last custody order and, second, that, “considering the asserted change of circumstances in the context of all relevant evidence, it would be in the child’s best interests to change custody.” Boldt and Boldt, 344 Or. 1, 9, 176 P.3d 388, cert. den., 129 S.Ct. 47, 172 L.Ed.2d 23 (2008). Id.  at 592.

In addition to being substantial, the change in circumstances must be unanticipated. Dillard and Dillard, 179 Or.App. 24, 30-31, 39 P.3d 230 (2002).

In Dewolfe v. Miller, 145 P.3d 338, 347-348, 208 Or. App. 726 (Or. App., 2006), the court held:

The long-established rule is that a party seeking modification of custody must “show a change of circumstances arising subsequent to the making of the last order respecting custody” and that changing custody would benefit the child. Henrickson v. Henrickson, 225 Or. 398, 402, 403, 358 P.2d 507 (1961). The “change of circumstances” requirement is satisfied “[i]f circumstances relating to the capability of one or both parents to care for their child have changed since the previous custody arrangement[.]” State ex rel Johnson v. Bail, 325 Or. 392, 394, 938 P.2d 209 (1997). The court considers the best interests of the child only if a change of circumstances is established. Id. at 397, 938 P.2d 209.

The change in circumstances rule is meant to avoid repeated litigation and promote stability for the child. Id. at 398, 938 P.2d 209; Ortiz and Ortiz, 310 Or. 644, 649, 801 P.2d 767 (1990). Unless the parent seeking a custody modification “establishes that the facts that formed the basis for the prior custody determination have changed materially by the time of the modification hearing, the prior adjudication is preclusive with respect to the issue of the best interests of the child under the extant facts.” Johnson, 325 Or. at 398, 938 P.2d 209. That preclusive effect means that a parent seeking a change in custody cannot rely, to establish a change in circumstances, on evidence that was or could have been introduced in the earlier custody proceeding. For example, a mother “could not obtain a change in custody solely upon the basis of evidence of the father’s conduct as shown in the transcript of the original proceeding or additional evidence which could have been introduced in the first proceeding but was not. In either instance, the decision in the prior proceeding would be res judicata in a subsequent modification proceeding, assuming that there was no evidence of a change in circumstances after the original decree.”  Greisamer and Greisamer, 276 Or. 397, 401-02, 555 P.2d 28 (1976) (italics added); see also Henrickson, 225 Or. at 402, 358 P.2d 507 (“The net effect of our earlier decisions is to render every prior custody order res judicata in any later modification matter.” (Italics added.)).

Under such res judicata principles, a purportedly changed circumstance cannot be a circumstance that the court contemplated at the time of the earlier determination. See Padbury and Padbury, 46 Or.App. 533, 536, 612 P.2d 321 (1980) (stating that change in circumstances “must be a change which was not contemplated at the time of the original decree” and the child’s increased age was not such a change); Wyatt and Wyatt, 36 Or. App. 563, 566 n. 1, 585 P.2d 31, rev. den., 284 Or. 521 (1978) (noting that the mother’s graduation from school and new employment “would not be a sufficient change of circumstances standing alone as it would have been reasonably contemplated at the time the decree was entered”). That rule also applies when a parent fails to raise a known circumstance in an earlier custody proceeding. In Southworth and Southworth, 113 Or.App. 607, 835 P.2d 122, rev. den., 314 Or. 574, 840 P.2d 1296 (1992), we did not consider the mother’s nudist lifestyle to be a change in circumstances. Although the court was unaware of that lifestyle at the time of the initial judgment, the father and his attorney knew and failed to raise the matter before the judgment was signed and entered. We explained, “If father thought that the evidence was relevant to mother’s capacity to care for their child, he should have brought it to the court’s attention, instead of reserving it for use in relitigating the issue of custody.” Id. at 614, 835 P.2d 122.”  Id. at 347-348.

Accordingly, so long as there has been an unanticipated substantial change of circumstances since the award of custody to your ex-husband, you can bring a motion to modify custody. In order to prevail on your motion, you will need to prove it is in your children’s best interests that you be awarded custody instead.

If you need a divorce attorney, please contact the Law Office of Bret D. Lubic, 503-232-3940 or click here today. My office is located at 1507 SE 45th Avenue, Ste. 308, Portland, OR 97215.

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

What Can I Do If I Discovered a Mistake in My Oregon Divorce Judgment?

Friday, April 26th, 2013

Happy couple seal a deal with their personal financial advisor at home

What Can I Do If I Discovered a Mistake in My Oregon Divorce Judgment?

If the mistake occurred because of an oversight or an omission, you can ask the court to correct the error.  ORCP 71A. These mistakes normally occur during the drafting of the divorce judgment and are clear to everyone involved including the lawyers.  In my 20 years of practice as a divorce attorney, I have never had a dispute with another attorney over a clerical mistake. That’s because as humans we recognize these mistakes sometimes happen, which is why we have a rule that allows such mistakes to be easily fixed.

Other mistakes may occur, however, where the only remedy is to vacate or set aside the divorce judgment.  In other words, in some situations you can tear up your divorce judgment and begin again. These types of mistakes need to be brought to the attention of the court as soon as they are discovered, and not more than one year after the divorce judgment is entered. ORCP 71B(1)(a).

I recently had a case where the father mistakenly reported his net income instead of his gross income on a divorce form.  As a result of the mistake, the father’s child support obligation for three children was less than it should have been.  The mother, meanwhile, was a housewife during the marriage without any prospect of employment.  Neither the mother nor the father sought the advice of an attorney before signing the divorce judgment, and the mother agreed the father did not have to pay her spousal support (alimony).

Both the husband and wife testified in court they were unaware of the mistake.  As a result, much to the father’s chagrin, the court set aside the judgment.  Consequently, the mother now has a second chance to ask for what she is entitled to, namely, an appropriate amount of child support and spousal support.

The lesson that can be learned from this case is that you should never sign a divorce judgment without the advice of an attorney.  You don’t necessarily need to be represented by an attorney, but you should have an attorney review your divorce judgment before you sign it because mistakes can occasionally occur.  Luckily for my client, she came to see me within one year of her divorce, and we were able to obtain the relief she needed.

If you need a divorce attorney, please contact the Law Office of Bret D. Lubic, 503-232-3940 or click here today. My office is located at 1507 SE 45th Avenue, Ste. 308, Portland, OR 97215.

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

Should I Get a Divorce?

Monday, April 15th, 2013

Middleaged happy couple

Another way to ask this question is:  Can people change? Can my spouse change? Can I change? If you adopt the principles of Determinism, the theory that our character has been determined by our genetic history, family and upbringing, then the answer is no.  If you adopt the principles of Free Will, the theory that regardless of the choices we have made thus far, we get to make choices in the future that can change our character, or more importantly, how our character is perceived, then the answer is yes.

Of course, in a relationship, it takes two people, not one, to effectuate real change. Both partners must be willing to look forward, not back, in order to give change a fair chance.  If either partner thinks change is impossible, then no amount of couples counseling or individual counseling will fix the problem.

Socrates said, according to Plato, ask a lot of questions.  Aristotle said, before you start asking questions, ask if there is an expert in the field, and if there is an expert, defer to the expert; however, if there are no experts, either everyone gets to be an expert or no one gets to be an expert.

One of the things we know in the 21st century that was not known by our ancient philosophers is how our hormones and brain chemicals affect the way we think.  Sometimes we make poor decisions when our hormones are off balance, or when we are impaired by alcohol or drugs.  Sometimes our behavioral patterns induce poor decision-making.  Ultimately, the question is:  Can we train the brain? Some experts say yes, others say no.  There is no universal opinion regarding this matter.  My opinion as a Portland, Oregon divorce attorney with 20 years experience is that it depends on a person’s attitude.

Psychotherapists, among other social scientists, are trained to diagnose their patients based on objective categorical criteria, yet we are all individuals who experience life subjectively.  While we do have commonalities, we are all unique. Nevertheless, we each have the capacity to adapt to our ever changing social environment.  Look at how the cell phone has changed our culture over the last ten years. Moreover, we have the capacity to effectuate social change as a society, as evidenced by the enactment of civil rights laws over the last 100 years.  If we have the power to change the way we behave and think as a society, then we have power to change the way we behave and think as individuals.  In other words, we know people can change.  We have seen people change.  It begins with an open mind.

Back to the original question:  Should you get a divorce?  The answer lies in your and your partner’s willingness and ability to make changes in the relationship, and in yourselves.

If you need a divorce attorney, please contact the Law Office of Bret D. Lubic, 503-232-3940 or click here today. My office is located at 1507 SE 45th Avenue, Ste. 308, Portland, OR 97215.

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

Collaborative Divorce – A New Way of Thinking

Thursday, April 11th, 2013

Collaborative Divorce

Divorce can be costly.  Not just financially, but emotionally.  You don’t need to be a divorce attorney to understand the devastating consequences a divorce may have on an entire family.

When there is contentious litigation over custody, parenting time, child support and / or spousal support, and both parties are represented by attorneys charging $250 or more per hour, a divorce can easily cost a parent in attorney’s fees alone the tuition for an undergraduate degree at the University of Oregon.

The emotional price of a litigious divorce is a completely different matter. When parties end up battling in court over issues regarding their children, they almost never leave the court room as friends.

One of the reasons why divorces end up in the courtroom is due to our adversarial legal system.  Think about that for just a minute.  Adversity induces conflict.  It does not inhibit it.  Ultimately, it takes cooperation, not adversity, for parties to reach a settlement agreement. The simple act of engaging in a settlement dialogue requires some level of cooperation. If one spouse insists on having an issue decided by a judge, then the other spouse must engage in the court battle if he or she does not want to lose by default.

One option available for parties to settle their differences out of court is through mediation, where a neutral third person assists the parties in reaching a settlement, if one can be reached.  Another option the parties may consider for the purpose of reaching a settlement is through collaborative divorce.

A collaborative divorce is non-adversarial. Through the collaborative process, the parties and their attorneys agree to work jointly with each other, not against each other, to resolve any issues in dispute. This process encourages cooperation among everyone involved, particularly the professionals.  Through cooperation, the parties have a much better chance of reaching a settlement than through adversity.

Every action we take has the potential to create positive or negative feelings within us. In my twenty years of practicing law, I have never had a client who wasn’t nervous about going to court. More often than not the outcome is uncertain. Ultimately, a trial is a competition which neither side wants to lose. I have often advised clients they have more control over the outcome of a case through settlement and compromise than through a court contest.  Not surprisingly, parties faced with a divorce are much more satisfied with the collaborative process than the traditional process. Not only because it is less expensive, but also because it gives them empowerment over the outcome.

If you are interested in learning more about collaborative divorce, please contact the Law Office of Bret D. Lubic, 503-232-3940 or click here today. My office is located at 1507 SE 45th Avenue, Ste. 308, Portland, OR 97215.

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

Oregon Family Law: Breach Of Fiduciary Duty

Wednesday, November 21st, 2012

 

Spouses, even those not cohabiting, owe one another a fiduciary duty of good faith and fair dealing. A fiduciary duty between spouses is a legal duty to act in the best interests of the marital union, just like a fiduciary duty between business partners is a legal duty to act in the best interests of the business.

For example, if Jack, immediately before filing for divorce, liquidates a savings account he owns jointly with his wife, Jill, without Jill’s knowledge or consent, and gives the money to his cousin, Joe, to hold for him until after the divorce is final, he has breached his fiduciary duty to Jill.  In this instance, Jill can request the court to punish Jack for his breach of fiduciary duty, and the court has the discretion to do so.

As explained by the Oregon Court of Appeals in Dunkin and Dunkin, 162 Or App 500 (1999),

A fiduciary duty exists when there is a relationship of special confidence, in which one party to the relationship is bound to act in good faith and with due regard to the interests of the other. Starkweather v. Shaffer, 262 Or 198, 205, 497 P2d 358 (1972). Oregon courts have recognized that a relationship of husband and wife is such a relationship of special confidence, requiring “a fiduciary duty of the highest degree.” Eltzroth and Eltzroth, 67 Or App 520, 525, 679 P2d 1369 (1984). That fiduciary duty continues “‘while the parties contemplate dissolution of their marriage as long as the confidential relationship remains intact, and the parties are not dealing at arms’ length through separate agents or attorneys.’” Auble and Auble, 125 Or App 554, 560, 866 P2d 1239 (1993) (quoting Eltzroth, 67 Or App at 522).

* * * * *

A marital partner who is subject to a fiduciary duty has a duty “to deal with [the other marital partner] fairly and to make a full and frank disclosure of all circumstances materially bearing on the contemplated agreement, including a full disclosure of marital assets.” Eltzroth, 67 Or App at 526.

Because the relationship between spouses is fiduciary in character, and imposes upon them an obligation of loyalty and of the utmost good faith, fairness and honesty in their dealings with each other, anyone contemplating a divorce or legal separation is advised to be honest and truthful to his or her spouse with respect to matters pertaining to the marital estate, otherwise, he or she risks being punished by the court when it comes to dividing the parties’ assets and liabilities.

If you have any further questions about Fiduciary Duty, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Image Source: http://img.ehowcdn.com/article-new/ehow/images/a06/dm/e3/meaning-fiduciary-duty_-800×800.jpg

Bookmark and Share

About Voluntary Termination of Parental Rights

Thursday, November 15th, 2012

My ex has moved away and refuses to let me see my child or even talk to her on the phone. I’ve sent cards and letters but they were returned unopened. I can barely make my house payments because so much of my pay is being withheld for child support, and as near as I can tell she spends all the money on herself and not my child. I would like to terminate my parental rights and get my life back; how do I do this?

It is unfortunate that you (and your child) are facing this situation but, as with all matters of family law, there are right ways and wrong ways of dealing with it. You can request a modification of your support obligation or enforcement of your parenting time, but unless your ex remarries and her husband adopts your child, you cannot terminate your parental rights.

You must remember that Oregon family law always puts the child’s best interests first. Under Oregon law, ”The terms of child support and parenting time (visitation) are designed for the child’s benefit and not the parents’ benefit. You must pay support even if you are not receiving visitation. You must comply with visitation orders even if you are not receiving child support.” ORS 107.106

The law also states “It is the policy of this state to assure minor children of frequent and continuing contact with parents . . . and to encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of raising their children . . . .” ORS 107.149

In your case, voluntary termination of your parental rights would not benefit your child because it would simply remove one of her two parents from her life, and leave her entirely dependent on the resources of the one remaining parent. The state will simply not allow this.

However, just as you are under court order to pay child support for your child’s benefit and can be penalized for failing to do so, your ex is under court order to allow parenting time for your child’s benefit, and she can also be penalized for failing to do so.

You can ask the court to help enforce your parenting time. There is a wide range of solutions and penalties available, from ordering make-up parenting time to scheduling a hearing to change custody to you. Every county has its own policies and forms for enforcing parenting time, so you should determine which court you will be filing in and then check that court’s procedures.

If you feel your child support payments are excessive and you are in danger of losing your home, you can ask to have your obligation reconsidered. You can do this through the court, but you can also do it administratively through the Division of Child Support.

Oregon courts make every effort to be accessible to everyone and many courts have facilitators who can help you with forms and procedures, but they cannot give you legal advice. An Oregon family law attorney can help you decide which options are best for you.

Taking legal measures to enforce your parenting time rights may not be easy, but it may be the only way to make sure your child enjoys the benefit of having both parents in her life, which is truly in her best interest.

If you have any further questions about Child Support, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

Types of Spousal Support

Monday, November 5th, 2012

 

I always thought alimony was alimony, but now that I’m getting divorced I’m told that, besides the fact it’s now called “spousal support,” there are several different kinds. How do I know what kind might be awarded in my case? Could more than one kind be awarded?


Oregon law differentiates among three types of spousal support: transitional, compensatory, and maintenance.
Transitional support is intended to help one party obtain education or job training so they will be able to work and earn enough to live about as well as they did during the marriage. For some this will mean going to college or vocational school to start a new career; for others it will mean preparing to re-enter a field they have been away from.
Transitional support is typically ordered when the marriage wasn’t very long and/or when the party receiving the support is relatively young and healthy, and can be expected to achieve financial independence within a reasonable time. It usually has an end date, and may be “stepped down,” or decreased over time.
Compensatory support is intended for situations where one party has made a significant contribution to the other’s education, career or earning capacity. The contribution may have been financial, such as paying for a college education, or non-financial, such as raising the children and maintaining the family home so the other person could focus on their career.
Usually, one party has sacrificed their own opportunities in order to focus on putting the other party in a better position than they could have achieved on their own, and usually they expected to share in the benefits gained. Even when one party has made such a significant contribution, however, the court must still decide compensatory support is “just and equitable in all of the circumstances.” The court may rule that the marital estate – that is, the assets that are going to be divided between the parties – has already benefited so much from the party’s contribution that they will be adequately compensated by their share of the estate. This kind of support is not commonly awarded.
Maintenance support may be awarded when one party leaves the marriage with much greater earning potential or assets, and it’s unlikely the other party will ever catch up. This kind of support is more likely to be awarded after a long-term marriage, and may have an end date or may continue indefinitely. Maintenance support may also be scheduled to change over time; for example, when one of the parties retires, or when the minor children become adults. Sometimes maintenance support ends when the party receiving the support remarries, but this isn’t always the case.
More than one kind of spousal support may be ordered, and each kind may have its own schedule and may change over time. Spousal support is also subject to modification at the request of either party, if they can show a change in circumstances that makes it appropriate to reconsider the award.
Determining what kind of spousal support, if any, should be awarded can be a complicated matter, and may require the services of professionals such as actuaries or experts in qualified domestic relations orders. Your Oregon divorce attorney will recommend and help find these kinds of experts if they are needed in your case.

If you have any further questions about Spousal Support, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Image Source: http://www.washingtondivorce.com/resources/Washington+spousal+support+attorneys+and+divorce+lawyers..jpg

Bookmark and Share

Suit Money: Divorce Court And Comparable Representation

Thursday, November 1st, 2012

 

My spouse, who has a high-paying job and significant assets, has hired a prominent divorce lawyer. My income is much lower and I can’t afford comparable representation. Is there some way to level the playing field?

We would like to believe money doesn’t buy an advantage in legal proceedings, but of course it does. An attorney’s fees are based on education, experience, resources and proven record of success. Your spouse’s attorney gained prominence by consistently winning favorable outcomes for his or her clients; to protect your interests you will need an attorney with similar qualifications.

Oregon law gives the court the authority to order one party to a separation, annulment or dissolution proceeding to provide “such amount of money as may be necessary to enable the other party to prosecute or defend the suit.” ORS 107.095(1)(a).

This is commonly known as “suit money,” and it may be ordered in addition to temporary spousal or child support. To ask for suit money you must file a motion, affidavit and order with your county family law court.

The Oregon Department of Justice provides a number of standard forms for use in dissolution cases, but a request for suit money is not among them. You should first do some research and select an attorney who has experience and resources similar to your spouse’s, and have that attorney help you request suit money.

The Oregon State Bar offers an attorney referral service; you can call them at 800-452-7636 or visit the OSB website at www.osbar.org. Telephone book listings and ads can give you a good idea of what different lawyers offer, and most now have their own websites as well. You may also get good referrals by asking friends and family; with around 50% of all marriages now ending in divorce, most people you know are likely to have some experience in this area.

If you have any further questions about Suit Money, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

Awarding Spousal Support: Standard of Living

Thursday, October 25th, 2012

Thanks to the spousal support I pay, my ex lives just as well now as when we were married, but I can barely make ends meet and have had to give up a great deal just to get by. I want to have my support obligation reduced, but I can’t claim a “change in circumstances” – it’s been this way ever since the divorce.

Two may not be able to live as cheaply as one, but there are certainly cost savings that come with living as a couple. It can be a challenge to meet the expenses of two households after divorce if there is little or no corresponding increase in income.

Under Oregon law, when the court divides a divorcing couple’s property, it is to do it in a way that “may be just and proper in all the circumstances.” This doesn’t always mean splitting everything down the middle; the key is for the parties to leave the marriage on as equal ground as is practical.

When awarding spousal support, the court is to decide what is “just and equitable” after taking into consideration a number of factors, including how long the parties were married, how much each of them earns and what their potential earnings may be, and the standard of living established during the marriage.

The standard of living established during the marriage is given great weight, because the court must try to ensure that each party can maintain after divorce a standard of living “not overly disproportionate” to that enjoyed during the marriage. This doesn’t mean their incomes and assets will be equal, but that one will not enjoy a windfall at the expense of the other.

It is important to remember that the “not overly disproportionate” standard applies equally to the party paying support and the party receiving support. The Oregon appellate court made this point explicitly in a recent case, Sather and Sather (2010).

In that case, the court reduced the spousal support obligation because although the party receiving the support was able to enjoy a standard of living virtually the same as during the marriage, the party paying the support was left with too little to maintain a similar standard of living.

Usually, if one party wants to reduce or increase the amount of spousal support that was awarded at the time of the divorce, they must show there has been a change in the financial picture – a loss of income or increase in expenses – making reconsideration necessary.

In Sather, the appellate court did not modify the support ordered by the trial court because there had been a change in circumstances, but because the award was inequitable from the beginning.

This shows that even judges can make mistakes, and you can’t take it for granted that spousal support will be calculated fairly.

However, it also means you may have a good chance of reducing your support obligation if you can prove your current standard of living is “overly disproportionate,” in a negative sense, to the one you enjoyed before your divorce. Ask your Oregon family law attorney if the decision in Sather is pertinent to your case.

If you have any further questions about Spousal Support, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on FacebookTwitter, and Linkedin as well!

Bookmark and Share

No Fault vs. Uncontested Divorce

Monday, September 24th, 2012

 

I thought Oregon

was

a “no fault” divorce state, but when I saw a paralegal about preparing my paperwork I was told they only handle “uncontested” divorces and that I should see a lawyer.

When you file a petition for divorce, you are in essence initiating a civil law suit against your spouse, “suing” for divorce. Until 1983, every state required a showing that at least one marital partner was “at fault” for the breakdown of the marriage, by virtue of bad behavior such as adultery, abandonment or cruelty. The person asking for the divorce was the “plaintiff,” the other person was the “defendant,” and the case proceeded to trial, with the plaintiff setting out to prove the defendant had committed, if not an actual violation of law, at least a violation of marital decency. If the plaintiff prevailed (that is, if they “won” their case) the divorce was granted, but if the defendant prevailed the divorce was denied.

In 1983 California became the first state to introduce “no fault” divorce, which allowed either spouse to file for divorce on the basis that the couple had “irreconcilable differences” that made continuation of the marriage impossible. One by one other states began enacting their own no fault laws, and by 1985 no fault divorces were available in every state in the nation but one. In October 2010 New York became the last state to allow no fault divorce.

Under no fault laws, it is not necessary for both spouses to want the divorce; if one person files for divorce, it will go through. Even when both parties agree to split up, though, they may still disagree on such matters as custody, child and spousal support, and division of property and debts. Oregon law states that certain of these matters must be addressed in the final judgment.

In the petition for divorce the moving party, now known as the “petitioner,” will suggest how these matters should be settled. The other party, now known as the “respondent,” may agree to the proposed terms, disagree and suggest different terms, or disagree and ask the court to decide on the terms.

Disagreement on any of the proposed settlement terms makes the divorce “contested,” but it is the settlement proposal that is contested, not the divorce itself. For example, the petitioner may propose that no spousal support be paid, and the respondent may feel spousal support should be awarded.
If the parties cannot reach an agreement on the terms of the settlement, the case may still proceed to trial. In this case, rather than one party trying to prove the other party is “at fault” for the failure of the marriage, each party presents the case in favor of their proposed settlement terms. The prevailing party gets the terms they want, such as spousal support or no spousal support.

Under Oregon no fault divorce law, if you and your spouse agree on settlement terms, the divorce is uncontested and it may be appropriate for you to prepare your own paperwork or hire a paralegal to help you. However, if you disagree on how these matters should be resolved, you should consult with an attorney to make sure your interests are protected.

If you have any further questions about No Fault Divorce Laws, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!

Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.

Check us out on Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin as well!

Format

I thought Oregon was a “no fault” divorce state, but when I saw a paralegal about preparing my paperwork I was told they only handle “uncontested” divorces and that I should see a lawyer.
When you file a petition for divorce, you are in essence initiating a civil law suit against your spouse, “suing” for divorce. Until 1983, every state required a showing that at least one marital partner was “at fault” for the breakdown of the marriage, by virtue of bad behavior such as adultery, abandonment or cruelty. The person asking for the divorce was the “plaintiff,” the other person was the “defendant,” and the case proceeded to trial, with the plaintiff setting out to prove the defendant had committed, if not an actual violation of law, at least a violation of marital decency. If the plaintiff prevailed (that is, if they “won” their case) the divorce was granted, but if the defendant prevailed the divorce was denied.
In 1983 California became the first state to introduce “no fault” divorce, which allowed either spouse to file for divorce on the basis that the couple had “irreconcilable differences” that made continuation of the marriage impossible. One by one other states began enacting their own no fault laws, and by 1985 no fault divorces were available in every state in the nation but one. In October 2010 New York became the last state to allow no fault divorce.
Under no fault laws, it is not necessary for both spouses to want the divorce; if one person files for divorce, it will go through. Even when both parties agree to split up, though, they may still disagree on such matters as custody, child and spousal support, and division of property and debts. Oregon law states that certain of these matters must be addressed in the final judgment.
In the petition for divorce the moving party, now known as the “petitioner,” will suggest how these matters should be settled. The other party, now known as the “respondent,” may agree to the proposed terms, disagree and suggest different terms, or disagree and ask the court to decide on the terms.
Disagreement on any of the proposed settlement terms makes the divorce “contested,” but it is the settlement proposal that is contested, not the divorce itself. For example, the petitioner may propose that no spousal support be paid, and the respondent may feel spousal support should be awarded.
If the parties cannot reach an agreement on the terms of the settlement, the case may still proceed to trial. In this case, rather than one party trying to prove the other party is “at fault” for the failure of the marriage, each party presents the case in favor of their proposed settlement terms. The prevailing party gets the terms they want, such as spousal support or no spousal support.
Under Oregon no fault divorce law, if you and your spouse agree on settlement terms, the divorce is uncontested and it may be appropriate for you to prepare your own paperwork or hire a paralegal to help you. However, if you disagree on how these matters should be resolved, you should consult with an attorney to make sure your interests are protected.
If you have any further questions about No Fault Divorce Laws, please contact the attorney at law experts at Bret D. Lubic, PC to learn more. Call 503.232.3940 or click here today!
Bret D. Lubic,PC attorneys at law is focused on family law and estate planning matters. We handle cases in Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties, and the State of Oregon at large. Learn more about us click here.
Check us out on Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin as well!
Path:

Bookmark and Share